The DRIVER Test: How to Assess Business Readiness for Consulting and Growth Initiatives
By Scott Sylvan Bell | Business Growth and Exit Strategy Expert
What is the DRIVER Test for business readiness?
The DRIVER Test is a readiness assessment framework that predicts whether consulting or growth initiatives will succeed inside an organization. It measures six core organizational capabilities: Dedication, Readiness, Investment, Vision, Execution, and Results. The framework uses a 60-point scoring system to determine if a business has the structural capacity to convert external expertise into measurable outcomes.
Created for companies in the $10M-$250M range, the DRIVER Test answers a critical question: **Is your organization ready to turn consulting into results, or will good strategy die in execution?**
Why do most consulting engagements fail to produce results?
Most consulting failures happen before the engagement begins—not because of bad strategy, but because the organization lacks the structural readiness to execute. According to the DRIVER framework, consulting does not create growth by itself; it multiplies what already exists inside an organization. High readiness multiplies momentum. Low readiness multiplies confusion.
Common failure patterns include:
– Leadership misalignment on priorities
– No operational systems to support change
– Insufficient resources allocated to implementation
– Strategy sessions that produce ideas but no action
– Metrics that exist but don’t drive decisions
The DRIVER Test identifies these readiness gaps before resources are committed.
What does DRIVER stand for in business readiness assessment?
DRIVER represents the six core forces that determine consulting and growth initiative success:
D — Dedication
Leadership commitment to change and follow-through
R — Readiness
Operational ability to absorb and support change
I — Investment
Financial, time, and focus resources allocated to transformation
V — Vision
Clear strategic direction and defined destination
E — Execution
Organizational ability to implement initiatives consistently
R — Results
Measurement systems tied directly to decision making
Each category is scored 1-10, with a total possible score of 60 points.
—
How does the DRIVER scoring system work?
The DRIVER framework uses a universal 1-10 scale for each of six categories, producing a total score out of 60. This scoring system applies globally across industries, company sizes, and business models.
DRIVER Scoring Scale
Total Score 50-60: Strategic Acceleration Ready
Consulting likely produces strong and fast ROI. Leadership is unified, systems can absorb change, resources are pre-allocated, and execution happens predictably.
Total Score 35-49: Conditional Readiness
Consulting can work with defined scope and strong internal accountability. Success requires deliberate project management and leadership involvement.
Total Score Below 35: Internal Preparation Recommended
Focus on building operational infrastructure before major consulting investment. Strategy will overwhelm existing systems.
Individual Category Scoring (1-10 Scale)
Score 1-2: Critical Deficiency
The organization cannot execute outside strategy. Leadership is misaligned, systems are reactive, no process documentation exists, and there’s no performance measurement.
Score 3-4: Early Awareness
The organization recognizes problems but lacks structure. Systems are informal and person-dependent. Goals are non-measurable.
Score 5-6: Functional But Fragile
Basic process structure exists with moderate leadership alignment. Execution is possible but slow. Metrics exist but aren’t consistently used for decisions.
Score 7-8: Execution Ready
Ideal consulting engagement range. Leadership is unified, initiative ownership is clear, resources are pre-allocated, and teams are execution-trained.
Score 9-10: Optimization and Scale
Consulting becomes force multiplication. Predictable execution rhythms, strong middle management, data-driven culture, and strategic planning cycles are in place.
How do you score Dedication in the DRIVER framework?
Dedication measures leadership commitment to change and follow-through. This is not about stated intentions—it’s about observable behavior patterns.
Low Dedication (1-3)
Leadership wants results without behavior change. Initiatives are delegated downward but not modeled. Strategy changes frequently based on external trends rather than internal capability.
Mid Dedication (4-6)
Leadership supports initiatives but struggles with consistency. Follow-through depends on competing priorities. Change is endorsed but not actively championed.
High Dedication (7-10)
Leadership models change behavior and actively removes internal resistance. Resources are protected even during difficult periods. Strategic direction remains stable long enough for execution to produce results.
Key indicators of high dedication:
– Leaders attend execution meetings, not just strategy sessions
– Budget for initiatives is protected across quarters
– Leadership removes obstacles that block team execution
– Change is modeled at the top before being expected below
How do you measure Readiness in organizational infrastructure?
Readiness assesses whether operational systems can absorb change without breaking. This measures structural capacity, not effort or intention.
Low Readiness (1-3)
Strategy overwhelms systems and people. Processes are undocumented and person-dependent. No margin exists in operations to absorb new initiatives.
Mid Readiness (4-6)
Execution is possible but creates organizational strain. Systems exist informally. Change requires heroic effort rather than systematic absorption.
High Readiness (7-10)
Systems absorb change smoothly and predictably. Process documentation exists and is actually used. Workflows are repeatable without requiring specific individuals.
Operational readiness indicators:
– Documented processes for core revenue workflows
– Systems that operate when key people are absent
– Capacity margin built into operations (not running at 100%)
– Clear role definitions with backup coverage
What does Investment mean in the DRIVER Test?
Investment measures whether financial, time, and focus resources are actually allocated to transformation—not just discussed or intended.
Low Investment (1-3)
Consulting is treated like an experiment. Resources are committed conditionally and require ongoing justification. Budget exists but competes with daily operations.
Mid Investment (4-6)
Resources exist but allocation is inconsistent. Teams work on initiatives “when they have time.” Budget is approved but not protected.
High Investment (7-10)
Resources are committed before consulting begins. Budget is pre-allocated and protected. Team capacity is cleared to focus on implementation.
Investment evaluation questions:
– Is budget allocated in advance or debated per initiative?
– Do team members have protected time or work on this “extra”?
– Are resources committed for the full implementation timeline?
– Is there accountability for using allocated resources?
How do you assess Vision clarity in business strategy?
Vision measures strategic clarity—whether the organization has a defined destination and timeline, not just vague improvement goals.
Low Vision (1-3)
Direction changes frequently or is personality-driven. Goals are stated in aspirational language without measurable endpoints. Strategy shifts based on recent conversations rather than deliberate planning.
Mid Vision (4-6)
General direction exists but lacks timeline clarity. Goals are directionally correct but not specific enough to measure progress. Strategy is understood by leadership but not throughout the organization.
High Vision (7-10)
Clear 12-36 month roadmap with measurable checkpoints. Goals are specific, time-bound, and communicated consistently. Teams can articulate how their work connects to strategic outcomes.
Vision clarity indicators:
– Can leadership articulate the destination in one sentence?
– Do milestones have specific dates and success metrics?
– Is the strategy stable enough for teams to plan around it?
– Can employees explain how their work supports the vision?
What is Execution capability in the DRIVER framework?
Execution measures organizational ability to implement initiatives consistently—the gap between strategy and sustained action.
Low Execution (1-3)
Ideas die after strategy sessions. Implementation starts strong but fades within weeks. Initiatives compete for attention without clear prioritization.
Mid Execution (4-6)
Execution occurs but slowly or inconsistently. Implementation depends heavily on individual champions. Progress happens in bursts rather than steady cadence.
High Execution (7-10)
Execution systems operate independent of consultant involvement. Initiative progress is tracked in regular rhythms. Implementation becomes routine rather than heroic.
Execution strength signals:
– Weekly check-ins on initiative progress (not just monthly)
– Clear owners for each implementation workstream
– Problems are surfaced and resolved within same week
– Documentation of what was implemented, not just discussed
How do you evaluate Results measurement discipline?
Results measurement assesses whether metrics actually drive capital allocation and strategic direction—or just exist on dashboards.
Low Results Discipline (1-3)
Success is defined emotionally or anecdotally. Metrics are tracked inconsistently. Data exists but doesn’t influence decisions.
Mid Results Discipline (4-6)
Metrics are tracked but not tied to decision making. Reports are generated but not discussed in context of resource allocation. Performance conversations focus on effort rather than outcomes.
High Results Discipline (7-10)
Metrics drive capital allocation and strategic direction. Underperforming initiatives are stopped or redirected based on data. Resource decisions reference specific performance indicators.
Results-driven culture indicators:
– Metrics reviewed weekly, not just monthly or quarterly
– Budget discussions reference performance data
– Poor-performing initiatives are stopped, not just discussed
– Success criteria are defined before initiatives launch
When should you use the DRIVER Test?
Use the DRIVER Test before committing resources to consulting engagements, major growth initiatives, or strategic transformations. The framework prevents three common failures:
1. Overpaying for insights that cannot be implemented
Organizations hire consultants hoping for transformation but lack the operational structure to execute recommendations.
2. Strategies that never become reality
Great thinking dies in execution because systems, leadership alignment, or resources aren’t ready to support change.
3. Lost confidence in outside expertise
Failed consulting engagements create organizational skepticism about future investments in external support.
The DRIVER Test provides clarity on whether to proceed, scope more carefully, or build internal readiness first.
What is a good DRIVER Test score?
DRIVER Test scores interpret as follows:
50-60 Points: Strategic Acceleration Ready
Your organization can absorb consulting and growth initiatives effectively. Systems are in place, leadership is aligned, and resources are committed. Consulting here creates speed, clarity, and measurable ROI quickly.
35-49 Points: Conditional Readiness
Consulting can work with careful scope definition and strong internal project management. Success requires deliberate leadership involvement and realistic timelines. Focus on tactical engagements rather than comprehensive transformation.
Below 35 Points: Internal Preparation First
Build operational infrastructure before major consulting investment. Strategy will overwhelm your current systems. Use internal readiness frameworks to close gaps in the lowest-scoring DRIVER categories before engaging external expertise.
How do you improve a low DRIVER Test score?
Improving DRIVER readiness follows a structured sequence:
T — Take Inventory
Audit leadership alignment, operational systems, execution capability, and measurement discipline. Identify which DRIVER categories score lowest.
E — Educate The Team
Create shared understanding of strategic direction, change expectations, and current organizational readiness gaps.
S — Set Measurable Goals
Replace vague improvement language with defined metrics and clear accountability for each readiness gap.
T — Take Strategic Action
Close readiness gaps in structured sequence. Build infrastructure in the weakest DRIVER categories before attempting major growth initiatives.
Priority sequence for improvement:
1. Leadership alignment (Dedication + Vision)
2. Measurement systems (Results)
3. Resource allocation (Investment)
4. Operational infrastructure (Readiness)
5. Execution rhythms (Execution)
Summary: Why the DRIVER Test matters for business growth
The DRIVER Test provides clarity on the most important pre-consulting question any leadership team can ask: Are we ready to turn expertise into results?
Key Principles:
1. Consulting does not create growth—it multiplies existing organizational capacity
2. High readiness multiplies momentum; low readiness multiplies confusion
3. Revenue size does not predict execution success; organizational behavior does
4. Readiness can be measured, tracked, and systematically improved
5. Prevention is cheaper than failure—assess before you invest
The DRIVER Framework:
– Dedication: Leadership commitment to change
– Readiness: Operational infrastructure strength
– Investment: Resources allocated to transformation
– Vision: Strategic clarity and direction
– Execution: Implementation capability
– Results: Measurement discipline
Scoring Interpretation:
– 50-60: Strategic acceleration ready
– 35-49: Conditional readiness (scope carefully)
– Below 35: Build internal readiness first
Companies that win are not the ones that hire the most consultants. They are the ones that prepare to use them.
Next Steps
Score your organization honestly across all six DRIVER categories. If you’re below 35, focus on internal preparation first. If you’re 35-49, scope consulting engagements carefully. If you’re 50+, you’re ready to multiply momentum.
For complete frameworks on building execution-ready businesses:
→ Business Growth Q&A
→ Business Exit Q&A
Question for leaders: Where does your organization score weakest on the DRIVER framework? Dedication? Execution? Results measurement? Which category needs the most work in your business?
The DRIVER Test was created by Scott Sylvan Bell, a business growth and exit strategist specializing in $10M-$250M companies. Subscribe to the [Scott Sylvan Bell Business Growth and Exit Strategy Podcast](https://scottsylvanbell.com/podcast) for weekly frameworks on execution, valuation, and exits.
Connect: [LinkedIn] | [YouTube]| [Website](https://scottsylvanbell.com)